The human mind has evolved to always look for patterns that make sense of experiences. Even something as innately human as seeing is essentially a complex pattern recognition/prediction mechanism to discern meaningful “images” from a continuous stream of photons arriving at our eyes. When we experience any event that doesn’t easily conform to our expectations, we find ourselves impulsively drawn towards making sense of that aberration, like trying to discern images from the torrent of chaotic stimuli generated by light rays colliding with the cells in our retina.
Everyone knows all this. And everyone in their more meditative moments recognizes how much our minds rebel against uncertainty and ambiguity. Much of the pessimism in the world is born of the fact that the mind is more at ease expecting the worst compared to living in the awareness of the unknowability of the future. But being so very human as we all are, it needs conscious effort and some amount of self-discipline not to look for comforting generalizations when the facts of the world are discomforting.
But doesn’t that go against the whole scientific spirit of curiosity and seeking explanations? From Democritus to Dirac – while the names of Heisenberg and Schrödinger enjoy a degree of familiarity in the popular culture, the contributions of Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli and the great British theorist Paul Dirac are as fundamental to the foundations of quantum mechanics, and it is thanks to those foundational formulations, through semiconductor physics and all that came after, that you and I can now share common experiences despite being thousands of miles apart, but I digress – isn’t seeking the generalized laws of nature, the uber-pattern of things, one of our noblest and most meaningful aspirations?
So, if we are to seek a coherent pattern, a greater understanding so to speak, from Arsenal’s 1-1 away draw at Chelsea, would that be an attempt at satisfying our scientific instinct for knowledge or would that be looking for comforting solidity of our own intellectual horizons? Readers, I leave each of you to your own interpretations and conclusions.
I myself am not going to look for some greater insight in that result or performance that can then be used to try to predict the outcome of the rest of the season, or even the next match. That is the job of the ‘football scientists’, a.k.a media pundits, and readers, here too you are encouraged to find the suitable words to express your well-thought opinion of them. I reserve for myself the privilege of quoting the great Pauli’s (in)famous quip about a particularly careless scientific paper: “it is not even wrong.”
Anyway, please forgive my circuitous preamble. I feel not too inspired to recall a minute-by-minute account of a scrappy game where football took back seat to uncontrolled emotions, misplaced physicality, a flurry of cards, inconsistent refereeing, time-wasting, missed passes and poor touches, poor decisions, playacting, all in a blur of a kind of an anti-advertisement of Premier League Football.
I don’t like Chelsea football club. Never will. I understand not all Arsenal fans feel very strongly about them, or maybe everyone does. I remember very well from the mid-2000s the sheer distastefulness of the behavior on and off the field, the facts of how they were funded, and what their temporary dominance ended up signifying in teams of football governance. But my personal likes and dislikes don’t really matter. It would be great if Arsenal beats them every time the two teams meet, but then it would be great if Arsenal beats every team in every match we play.
Arsenal’s starting line-up, despite the late-determined absence of Saliba following a knock in the training, I felt was strong enough to play with the kind of controlled assertiveness – demonstrated with such finesse against Bayern in the mid-week – that has now become the defining characteristic of this season’s Arsenal. A bench that had Ødegaard and Madueke, and welcomed back Gyökeres, looked particularly potent. Defensively, even though Mosquera-Hincapié had never played together, their individual performances next to Saliba (and also Gabriel, in the case of Christhian) have been strong enough to assure us that they would manage, especially flanked by the peerless Timber on one side and increasingly consistent Calafiori on the other.
Raya
Timber-Mosquera-Hincapié-Calafiori
Zubimendi
Eze-Rice
Saka-Merino-Martinelli
The match started at a frenetic pace, and with poor quality on the ball from both sides. While Chelsea had come with a clear plan to be both physically disruptive and ambitious in attack, it is the former aspect that was most noticeable. This type of approach from the opposition is nothing new for Arteta’s Arsenal, when we are not allowed to find the control of the tempo and possession. A common tactical theme in that approach is the willingness to bypass the midfield. This season we have mostly played well against oppositions with that approach, with our defense and Zubimendi taking over the possession after the early frenetic stage, providing a platform for the rest of the team to find mooring.
While Hincapié and Mosquera are talented defenders, and both promise to eventually become world-class with ball on their feet, neither of them are quite the replacement of Saliba and Gabriel, especially Saliba, in terms of calmness and quality in possession, and the technical ability to control possession. Especially against the highly talented and dynamic set of attacking players that Chelsea started with, they defended well enough but found it difficult to build the controlled rhythm to bring the temperature of the game down. Timber was not at his very best, and one can hardly blame him given the two masterclasses to which he had treated us in the last seven days. Then, when Zubimendi received an early yellow card, and as a result had to curtail his natural front-footed approach, we lost much of our impetus in bringing any semblance of control over what had by then become a very chaotic match.
About the cards: Arsenal committed 12 fouls, Chelsea 13. We were shown six yellow cards, and Chelsea one yellow and that one reddest of reds. I don’t really know what Caicedo’s problem with the rest of humanity is, someone on the football field one of these days will pay a price for it. Thankfully it was not Mikel Merino and Arsenal. I don’t have anything to say about that imbalance of cards more than has already been said many times and is known to most Arsenal fans.
We didn’t play well in possession as we appeared emotionally and psychologically not in the right frame with many uncharacteristically poor decisions on the ball throughout the first half, and even more uncharacteristically lethargic out of possession and in duels. None of these are inexplicable, given the week we had and the performances we have put on, but was frustrating to experience nonetheless. We have become so used to the consistently high standards in the fundamentals of our game, days like these are apt reminders to enjoy the great performances without taking those for granted, apt reminders that the players are human beings. We had one bright attacking moment when Martinelli, Rice and Eze combined and Martinelli’s clever shot from the edge of the box was well saved by Sanchez, who saw the ball very late.
We started the second half with one substitution: MLS coming in for Calafiori who was on a yellow, and was likely to be the one tested most against the speedy Esteveo and Joao Pedro. Naturally the idea would have been to start dominating possession, make the numerical superiority count, start dictating the tempo, expect a defensive low block, and play the probing game.
The plan had to be discarded as Chelsea scored very early in the second half. From a corner. It seems they are the second best team in the PL after us in scoring set-piece goals, and on a day when our corners suffered from the same overall malaise of being not as good as usual, it was a particularly unpleasant way to concede against a ten man Chelsea. I am sure we can find some faults with one or two of our defenders in conceding, but only if we try very hard.
Chelsea 1 (Chalobah 48’) – Arsenal 0
We looked a bit surprised, and despite being a man down, Chelsea, buoyed by the home support, looked to enjoy themselves. Soon enough, Areta made a couple of substitutions – bringing Madueke on for Martinelli, and Ødegaard for Zubimendi with Rice dropping deeper to the number 6 role.
Saka was not having a particularly good day. I think something about Cucurella puts him off his game. It’s not like he is the only quality left back Bukayo faces in the world. So, what could it be?
Anyway, given that Saka – who plays nonstop when he is fit – was not at his best, and Madueke plays better on the right than left, I think there might have been a case for taking Saka off. However, as it is often the case, Saka even on the days when he is not playing very well, found a way to make a telling contribution with an excellent cross with his left foot that Mikel Merino thumped into the goal with a great leap and header.
Chelsea 1 (Chalobah 48’) – Arsenal 1 (Merino 59’)
Ødegaard’s presence helped us significantly to bring some organization and a measure of control. A fully fit and in-form Ødegaard brings a combination of control, creativity and consistency to our performance that is irreplaceable. Before his last injury, he seemed to have been on his way back to form. Let us hope we can keep him fit.
We started to attack with a bit more purpose. Arteta brought in Gyökeres in place of Eze, who like a few others had a rather subdued performance. Viktor had been one of our best players before he got injured – his performance against the defensive wall of Atletico Madrid being a key example of the kind of incisiveness and power he brings to our attack – and it was great to see him back in action, though he too found it difficult to make a meaningful impact. There was one movement when he combined with Merino and when Merino’s goalbound shot was excellently saved by Sanchez Viktor’s challenge for the rebound could have brought us a goal if not for brave goalkeeping. And then in the final seconds Hincapié chipped in a delightful cross from the byline that Gyökeres timed his run perfectly for a well-placed header, only to see Timber jump ahead of him and direct the ball wide.
In between, Saka and Madueke changed sides, we earned a few corners that we failed to get much out of, with in-swinging deliveries too easy for Sanchez to catch. To be fair to our players, they must have felt concerned for the well-being of their opposition players, given how easily they were losing their balance and starting to writhe on the floor. It was cinematic in its uncanny repetitiveness. Horror or comedy? Take your pick.
The match ended 1-1. If we are to look at the stats, that is a very fair result: both teams had 4 shots on target, xGs being 0.94 – 0.99, Chelsea took a total of 11 shots to Arsenal’s 8, we out-possessed them 62% to 38% which is expected given the red card, and there were three corners for each side. While our passing accuracy in the final third was noticeably better – 78% to 62% – they had better crossing accuracy with both sides delivering 15 crosses. If your eyes had told you that we were the second best in duels, the stats would support them: 56% duel success rate for Chelsea to 44% for Arsenal, for aerial duels 71% to 29%.
In short, a physically and psychologically fatigued team, playing away after two great performances in two key matches, missing their first choice central defenders one of whom is also the metronome of the team, failed to play to their typically high standards against a well-coached team full of young attacking talents. The points were deservedly shared, and the next match is three days away.
Dr F ,
Football reports come in many different ways and your opening paragraphs won’t be replicated in many of the reports on what was a typically British visceral derby, played at a fierce pace and very difficult to referee!
I felt the referee set the template for the game by determining to punish the first aggressive fouls with yellow cards. After twenty minutes he has a fistful of candidates for a red and ironically after giving most of the yellows to us the really serious foul was committed by them. At least he did not buy the play- acting that followed from the blue brigades but to book Gyokeres at the end was an example of the sanitisation of football. Any striker in the world worth his salt would make that attempt to play the ball.
A draw was a fair result. We need sensible rotation on Wednesday
I have to agree with TTG’s viewpoint on your introductory paragraphs, Dr F, any casual visitor to GHF might well imagine that they’d stepped into a parallel universe of uniquely presented commentary on football. Despite hours of endeavour, my mind never managed to come to terms with quantum mechanics and memories of your references there leave the hair on my neck rising like that on the tail of Schrodinger’s imaginary cat.
But then unfolds a very fine summary of yesterday’s game. I find it hard to add much to your thoughts on the 90 minutes. I found Chel$ki’s initial thuggery bemusing. Arsenal are very well equipped now to deal with a physical challenge, but some of their shithousery was beyond the pale and a red card/broken bone was almost inevitable. After the interval I thought we’d go on to win against ten, but to their credit, our depleted opponents performed well and the absence of our dynamic duo at centre back and the stresses and strains of a very demanding week contributed to that not being the case.
On Saka, I don’t think he’s reached his ‘heights’ so far this season – but I think Cucurella fears and hates playing against him, hence the early thuggery. He’s no match for our starboy.
Cheers Doc!
Quantum what, Dr. F? I certainly don’t disagree with anything you wrote in your game summary, but as for disagreements either any part of your preamble, well, I’m really not so sure. 🤣
Brilliant stuff, Dr F.
I was nearly tempted to skip the actual match report altogether after that introduction.
But the report is on point too.
Bravo, Dr. F. We looked physically and mentally tired. Your observation about Saliba’s importance to our capacity to impose control is well made.
My fun fact about Paul Dirac is that he went to primary school in Bristol with Cary Grant.
Well where to begin ? Semiconductor physics, quantum mechanics, a host of names unknown to me, and light rays crashing into my retina that clearly demonstrated to me the proximity of my own intellectual horizon.
After that there was a very well handled account of a very tedious , unpleasant game of football. To be clear, football can be a hard, physical game and I have no problem with that. Chelsea were clearly determined that this encounter would not descend into a contest of skill and, if they can do that within the rules, then so be it. To ensure that they do stay within the rules we had a very experienced referee – I still, sadly, remember him officiating at our first league match at the Emirates as long ago as 2006 against Aston Villa. Experience doesn’t seem to have imbued him with fairness. Six yellow cards for Arsenal – one for MLS for a perfectly fair shoulder charge – and one for Chelsea, plus a red card that should have needed absolutely no consideration from VAR, for a foul by the malevolent Caiceido that could have made a surgeon’s nightmare of Mikel Merino’s tib, fib and tarsals. Merino super generously said it was ok because he has “very flexible ankles”.
Chelsea must have spent the week training at the Allardyce-Pulis Academy. Anthony Taylor should have taken control of the game long before it was too late.
TTG@1: Giving early yellows is a defensible refereeing strategy (if possibly an early sign of a referee struggling to impose control), but it requires the discipline to follow through with second yellows. Otherwise, the deterrence effect evaporates, as we saw at the Bridge.
One of kind, doc. Much appreciated.
Chelsea played us like it was their cup final. They won’t be that up for it every game. We were as underwhelming as we’ve been all season. But we still got a point, which is absolutely fine from the bus stop. I’m not worried about them challenging us over the course of a season. They play too close to the bone (literally) and don’t have the control needed for consistent results.
We’ll need to use our squad wisely in the upcoming period. There are no easy games, and we need to keep putting points on the board. But this match is summed up by the doc’s last paragraph. Take the point and move on.
One further reflection is that I think we will learn a lot from this game. We could have stayed calmer and let Chelsea punch themselves out. Sure, Taylor gave us some yellows for stuff he let Chelsea get away with, but individually none of them were egregious decisions, and most of them were slightly panicked fouls where a man got beaten and chose to stop the attack rather than trust the rest of the defence.
Chelski were so frantic that we got suckered somewhat into their emotional approach and that’s something I think we can improve.
Arteta will certainly think that we didn’t handle the challenge Chelski presented as well as we could have, so he’ll be thinking about what he will want to see done differently if a similar situation arises, and he’ll make sure the players are ready.
I just wonder if we’ll win a match in April/May where we all look at it and think the opposition tried to do what the chavs did yesterday, only that time we were better prepared.
Thanks Doc, an exçellent report, I liked the way you went diractly
to the point and like you I will take the point and move on.
Quantum mechanics and Chelsea Football Club? Perhaps the two poles of human intellectual activity? I have never had any exposure to the former and virtually all the names cited in the third paragraph are as unfamiliar to me as the stars of JADES-GS-z14-0. I feel that my existence has not been rendered deficient by my lack of exposure to quantum mechanics, nor, I suspect, has this impaired my ability to take advantage of any developments arising from it that have fallen to lesser mortals.
On the other hand, the continued existence of Chelsea FC in the PL is a carbuncle upon the rather ugly face of ‘the beautiful game’ in this country. May all the pestilences that have smitten humanity throughout the millennia be inflicted upon it and all its scrofulous acolytes.
Good report of a horrible game, Dr F.
Bath@12: CFC are antimatter is all you need to know.
I have detested Chelsea (trying to avoid the use of the ‘hate’ word) since the days of Abramovic-Mourinho-Terry. In those days I disliked them even more than Tottenham. At the time Tottenham were irrelevant and posed us no threat at all. Not much has changed.
Chelsea, with the oligarchs stolen roubles, set about destroying the transfer market so as to make it impossible for any other club to compete with them.
That led to the emergence of national state oil funds and other nefarious billionaires taking over clubs, and ticket prices rising to a level where fathers and sons or daughters can only rarely attend games together any more. To that extent they destroyed the traditional fabric of the football crowd to be replaced by phone waving tourists trying to record games interspersed with their own mug shots to prove they’ve been there.
Thank goodness find still had enough of a voice to prevent the creation of the European super league (for now at least).
Chelsea are still involved in an attempt to dominate the market with billion dollar spending and amortising 9 year contracts for sone of the most promising young talent around. Some of that activity has already been stopped in its tracks. They, like C130y, still await decisions on the rest of it. Hopefully they will be deducted enough points to get them relegated. No, I’m not holding my breath.
Thank goodness fans – not ‘find’
Some wonderful ranting in the bar tonight. Keep it up chaps!
C100@16: 👍
How are you doing?
If anyone wants to get to a game over a 100 tix on Exchange for Brentford on Wednesday evening 7.30 ko. Category C so lowest prices.
https://x.com/laurielaker/status/1995614642836832360?s=61&t=cVFjCyGkt4y-Ne45LtfqkQ
Ned @17
A combination of the wonderful Trev and the NHS mean that I am slowly healing. Still not able to walk properly so no plans to go to games again yet. Taking it a week at a time.
Many thanks for all your good wishes.
Thanks everyone for the kind words!
If I were in charge of education system anywhere, Quantum Mechanics, Genetics, Music Theory (especially Bach), playing one instrument and learning to meditate would be mandatory curriculum to pass high school. 😂
Agree with everyone about the need for rotation. Hopefully Saliba’s injury is very minor and he would be back at least by the time we play Villa. Villa and City are the two toughest away fixtures we have left with. Given the very challenging set of matches we had started the season with, and the injuries we have suffered, we have put ourselves in a strong position. There has been tactical evolutions along the way, and we might yet see a few more: Eze on the left, Jesus on either wings or centrally, Kai and Viktor playing together. Maybe we would see MLS being used to give Rice a break sometimes, just as Norgaard can come in for Zubimendi.
More good wishes coming your way, c100. I hope you are much better soon.
C100@19: One step at a time, so to speak. But good to hear things are moving in the right direction. Hang in there.
Best of luck C100. What have you done to yourself?
A Message from the Willow Foundation:
This year, Willow is taking part in the Big Give Christmas Challenge, running for one week only from Tuesday 2 December. During this time, every donation you make will be DOUBLED, yes, doubled, thanks to our generous funders who have agreed to match your donation.
That means your gift will have twice the impact on the lives of seriously ill young adults.
Save the date and keep a look out for more details on how you can be part of this wonderful week of giving. Check out the Willow Foundation here.
Pangloss – trapped nerve in my back
With reports of serenity reigning in the scriptorium, the abaci clacking with soothing efficiency and the scribes working silently but quickly with practised hands, may I express my gratitude to all at Castle Ned for the excellence of their work on Week 13’s Predictathon. Well done all.
Fear not, BtM’s downward slide is but a temporary thing.
I admire your positive attitude, BtM. I’ve given myself two weeks to reverse my fortunes or I’m sacking myself. Second to tenth in two weeks ! Thank you, Ned – I think !
BtM@26 & Trev@27: Form is temporary; class is permanent.
Ecuadorians are becoming like London buses. None for ever and then a rush:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5yq45jq30qo
What Ned said @ 22, C100!
Ned @29
GHF have the inside track on this new Ecuadorean talent mining operation .
A number of us sporadically use El Rincon in Holloway Road pre- match . We are assured of a warm welcome there and next door . It is the only Ecuadorean restaurant I for one have ever used and serves a formidable ( very English ) Sunday lunch . We believe the proprietor is a talent scout connected to the club and the restaurant is just a front to confuse our rivals . The club these lads ( who let’s face it are a bit over the hill in relation to some of our emerging youngsters ) play for – Independiente del Valle- is the club that gave the world Piero Hincapie and is the dog’s testicles of youth development in South America ( I made that up) .
We must beware a midseason Copa America in 2030ish because with all our Brazilians and Ecuadoreans we won’t be able to get a team out!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>