Feed on
Posts
Comments

After a few false starts at writing this review when I just found no inspiration in recalling a match that while watching I had felt mostly a sense of ennui and pointlessness, which was only relieved by a few moments of errors that were so bizarre that the outrage was rather easily drained away by the force of the absurd, I ended up deciding to write about certain aspects of this match in specific – and football in general – that left the strongest impression. And I am talking not about Leno’s uncharacteristic howler here; but about unquestionably the most inexplicable VAR-based decision that at least I have noticed in the Premier League, where each matchday until now has contrived to outwit the previous weekend’s taste of the bizarre. I am also talking about something less inexplicable and bizarre than the variability of the VAR, though significantly more relevant for the Arsenal’s league standings in the seasons to come, namely our home form.

Speaking of Leno’s embarrassing own goal – all goalkeepers have a moment or two like that in a season and given the number of times Leno has saved our skin and his overall consistency and ability to bounce back from mistakes I don’t feel any need to add to questions and criticisms about him. However, in a game where our lack of nous and precision in the opposition’s final third – especially when that opposition was committed to a completely counter-attacking tactics and defended both men and space in numbers, creating low blocks and packed central areas – was so frustrating to watch, a mistake like that made the telling difference. For the first time ever, Everton won an away league match at Emirates, won an away league match at Arsenal after 24 years, completed a league double against Arsenal first time after 1985-86 season, and consigned us to our first ever Friday loss at Premier League. Most damningly, we have failed to score in eight home league games this season whereas in the four previous seasons combined we had failed to score at home only four times. That extraordinary statistic encapsulates our terrible home in a nutshell, and that home form is the key reason behind our simply unacceptable league position. I am sure Mikel and the team understands fully that this cannot simply go on.

In a match where two mid-table teams played out a mostly joyless, cagey game – though not without immense physical effort and tactical discipline, which in this case simply exacerbated the stultifying feeling of watching them play — where our efforts were undermined completely by our lack of imagination and freedom in playing, and laid bare the well-known limitations of the current Arsenal squad – especially with a few key offensive outlets missing through injury and illness —  as well as, and it gives me no pleasure in writing this, the limitations of our current young manager who is finding it hard to balance orchestration and individuality.

Coming at the end of a scandalous week in European football where things ended by becoming no worse than they already were, and who knows there may now even be some impetus in bringing in much necessary changes to the world of football governance and finances, this felt to me the right moment to discuss two changes I think many of us here would like to see going forward: a complete review and redesign of how VAR is being applied in English football, and less controversially a significant shift away from how Arsenal have become almost addicted to playing a limited, cautious game at home.   

Statistically speaking we dominated nearly a full-strength Everton with almost all of their key players in the starting line-up: possession, shots, shots on target, corners. From the very beginning Everton made their intention clear with players like James Rodriguez and Richarlison dropping deeper to help out defending attacks and always have two players man marking on any of the three key creative forces in the Arsenal line-up — Saka, ESR and Pépé – whenever they have the ball. Their idea was to initiate quick transition and once Arsenal have ball near our own goal press our famously self-sabotaging defense into making mistakes. This was Ancelotti playing more of the classical Italian catenaccio and less of the free-flowing Arrigo Sacchi – or for that matter, free-flowing Ancelotti – style football. They were convinced that we won’t be able to do much against an organized defense dropping so deep, and even if they might have not quite expected that it will be an unforced mistake of that implausibility which will give them the goal, they were proven right on our ability to find unique new ways of conceding.

This has been a theme all season. Whenever teams have come to Emirates with this time-worn blueprint we have served up performances and results of this exact type. Eight home games without scoring a goal! That’s astoundingly un-Arsenal, especially for many of us who have started following Arsenal at different points of the Arsène Wenger era. Our away form has been comparatively better this season, especially when the opposition teams have approached their games with an intent to take the initiative. There have been home matches too – especially after ESR and then later Ødegaard joined Saka in pulling the strings in the second half of the season — when a relatively open affair had seen us play passages of fast, precise, inventive football to give us a few enjoyable wins. But by now it has become quite concerning – especially coming after home draws of 1-1 against Fulham and Sparta Prague – that irrespective of the quality of the opposition, if they are willing to stick to this “defend deep in low blocks and force them to make a mistake or two” diligently we are almost always guaranteed to throw away three points.

There are of course some well-understood limitations right at the heart of our team: we do not have anyone who is consistently capable of seeing and executing defense-splitting passes from the deep, and who can initiate a fast transition through quick release to the wings. Against Everton, time and again Saka or Pépé will be perfectly placed to be released by a through ball when we had recovered possession in our own half and Everton had committed some of their players forward, but our “designated” passers will rotate the ball to patiently build up a move instead of seeing that angle and threading a pass through. I have nothing against rotating possession and patient build-up play, switching flanks and moving players around to create overloads and hence goalscoring opportunities, and grinding teams down by the speed of moving the ball around in constantly shifting triangles. Especially if you have the kinds of teams that Arteta’s coaching mentor always had at his disposal in Barcelona/Bayern/Man City with supreme technical players at every position. But that cannot be the only approach when teams are sitting deep, safe in their knowledge that they have already practiced against each variations of these over choreographed moves and they are not up against superior technical players at every position.

One of Arsène’s key footballing philosophy was to teach the team a kind of meta-tactics: strategies to individually and collectively find solutions to problems on the pitch, improving their football intelligence and most importantly trusting their abilities to innovate such solutions. It can be argued that towards the end of his managerial tenure he might have drifted too far into that philosophy almost as an ideal, eschewing the pragmatism of additionally preparing the team for the strengths and weaknesses of the opposition, but Mikel may want to think a little bit more about his Arsenal manager to keep his focus away from the manic obsessive Guardiola choreography: a little more jazz and a little less ballet.

In a match like this Saka and Pépé should have felt free to take the initiatives to switch flanks a few times, Xhaka and Ceballos not always hanging out at each other’s doorstep but maybe Partey coming in to the left and Ceballos joining Chambers on the right, Xhaka who has a decent left foot taking a corner while ESR (a midfielder with underrated defensive awareness) drops back to protect against counterattacks. Something unpredictable, maybe even a little bit of chaos in the opposition’s final third, a little less concerned about the mistakes they might make but more intent on enjoying their football.

Just to be clear, this is not an argument to replace Mikel. I think he is a manager of great potential; he is learning in the job and since he has taken over at Arsenal he has delivered a couple of trophies, and has made some noticeable improvements to few individuals and brought in a degree of tactical consistency and organization to our game which went completely missing in the final months of his Basque predecessor. He is also managing through tumultuous times in the world where clubs and individuals have been impacted in ways that one cannot really rely on past wisdoms to address. I completely support him and quietly confident that if the club hierarchy provides him with the right backing in the next couple of transfer windows, we will see Arsenal reemerge as a force in the premier league within a few seasons. Provided, provided, he himself learns to grow and reinvent himself, and maybe starts moving away from the cageyness of his approaches especially in home games. Let that hair down a little bit Mikel, it’s just football! This should be fun.

Whereas my innate optimism in well-meaning people makes me hope that Mikel will turn this wretched run of home form around, and we will start to make noticeable progress in league next season and this season he will find a way to help the team win the Europa league, such optimism doesn’t come naturally where VAR is concerned. Or rather, where VAR as it is being practiced in English football is concerned.

The disallowed penalty after a noticeable clip on Dani made him lose balance in the Everton penalty box – 100% foul and penalty as was correctly given by the referee — was bizarre not only in its conclusion but also how that conclusion was arrived at. VAR was supposed to be used to overturn noticeable and obvious errors made by referees and keep the game fair by removing as many poor on-field decisions as possible. The nanometer offside that was awarded against Pépé in the “build up” of the play where Dani was fouled completely subverts that principle: there was no noticeable error by the match officials in awarding the decision. The “offside” itself was irrelevant in the context as it happened probably 15 seconds before Dani was fouled and the ball had been rotated a few times by then. Finally, that “offside” was not a noticeable or obvious error. No matter how many lines they tried to draw to demonstrate the “proof” was completely inconclusive to suggest that the officials on the ground made any noticeable error.

This has been happening all throughout the season. Arsenal fans can feel particularly peeved by the number of strange VAR decisions we have been at the wrong end of. Before anyone dismisses that as a typical fan paranoia, I would like to see a distribution of VAR decisions for-and-against each club at the end of the season. Numbers don’t lie and there have been seasons past where post-season statistical analysis had underlined that Arsenal had received the highest numbers of wrong decisions.

But leaving aside the Arsenal-tinted grievances, just the sheer chaos, confusion and draining of the basic joy of football that VAR has brought into the English game has generated a very strong negative reaction. It simply doesn’t have to be so. Technology has been applied with excellent outcome in sports like Tennis or Cricket – especially in Cricket where umpiring decisions in the pre-technology days often used to stir up as much a drama as the proceedings between the twenty-two yards – and even in football there are other leagues where VAR is being used in a less dramatic and more consistent fashion. If the current trend of VAR in PL goes on fans – and one can feel even the players too as some of the most joyous moments of their careers are being ruined by the sheer arbitrariness of the decisions – will start to lose interest in the league. As with all technologies, the problem is not with the technology, but how it is being implemented and how inconsistently the rules surrounding its usage are being enforced. This simply cannot go on. After this season is over the English football’s governing body should work on simplifying and standardizing the VAR-based review process to make for a consistent experience where the focus should be on eradicating obviously poor decisions in a consistent and explicable manner, and not on scrutinizing every pivotal moment to the last dying millimeter of relevance only to come up with just another layer of subjective decision overriding the referee’s (sometimes moody) whistle.

Remember, pray, the 3rd of May…

Celebrate the true values and traditions of the Arsenal with Goonerholics Forever’s 1970-71 Double Anniversary Events.

Gorgeous George was always likely to pop up in the box! Did he touch the ball?

A placard produced by fans on the day

It was decided as soon as I heard Arsenal fans were going to demonstrate against the ESL- I ought, needed, had to turn up to register my feelings.  Given that I can get to the ground fairly easily it really wasn’t a sacrifice. My great grandfather whom I never met and my grandfather whom I did and who loved the Arsenal as Islington born and bred would both have wanted it. 

Coming out of Drayton Park station I was rather surprised to see police vans, 5 or 6 of them full with officers, parked up.   Why were they here?  This seemed to me to be something of a replica of the 70s and 80s style police provocation we were so used to. It smacked of a complete misunderstanding of the mood. Or a good way to get some overtime in. 

On walking past the imposing, Stalinist concrete installation art that is the “Arsenal” sign and over the Danny Fiszman bridge and you could already hear the noise.  Unmistakeably a football crowd – with those recognisable rhythmic expressions of support for our club, burned into our brains over so many years, ringing out loud and clear. On clearing the new Clock End, the vista over the Armoury Square became apparent.  And it brought back those memories of how things used to be pre-match before this evil virus took away our ability to inhabit our habitual place of worship.

And the first thing I noticed was the mix of fans.  Men, women, youngsters, old sweats, black, white and everything in between.  At one point there were even a couple of what the fanzine “One Nil Down…”, sadly long defunct, christened “The Brinkley-Smythes’ of Highbury N5”.   As with many of the recent wave of incomers to the area which has become gentrified out of all recognition from when I grew up there, they looked somewhat bemused by it all and as though they were there as part of an anthropological research study, but bless them anyway for turning up.

And the crowd was very good humoured.  United in its focus but, without the opportunity to get in to see the game there was a rather calmer, less testosterone-filled charge to the proceedings.  We all knew why we were there. It was to register our loathing of an ownership which had sought to sell out our dreams. The songs rang out. Adaptations of our familiar standards, but with the object of derision amended to include the ownership. Some suitably scatological.  All heartfelt and passionate.  More than that though, because it needed to be said that we love our club and that we were there not to bring fire down on the team. There were renditions of many songs dear to our hearts – Rocky was remembered very early in the proceedings. A fitting tribute. Banners and placards were there in abundance. All with a common message. Time to go, Mr Kroenke.

From Twitter. A brilliant photograph by AFC_GLEN

There were no speakers, which might have been nice but might also have been a rallying call for some of those with motives beyond the peaceful protest I’m glad to say we observed. Round about 7pm, with the police beginning to mass and thoughts of the ridiculous treatment of the women who marched in Clapham a few weeks ago and the, shall we say, over-zealous policing they experienced I decided it was time to leave. I had registered my protest. More than that, I had done my duty.

Back to my great grandfather and granddad – of course I have no way of knowing if they would have wanted me to attend, but that’s the story we tell ourselves.  We are connected to the club by bonds of time and family. The club is part of our own personal history. And that is something which the shameless acolytes of Mammon who own the club now recognise only in part. The part which will see us turn up, regardless of cost and time and buy overpriced tickets and over watered beer to be part of the experience and connect with something which is more than an architectural edifice, a part of our heritage.  Well, now they are beginning to understand the other side of that coin. We will tolerate a lot. But if you seek to interfere with our shared past, you do so at your peril.

The people have spoken. Long live the revolution!

A placard produced by fans on the day

Meanwhile, back at the ranch (!).

The owners may be disingenuous, the manager may still be finding his feet, the players may be accident-prone but we can still celebrate our history.

John Radford scores again! One of Arsenal’s greatest centre forwards. 54 apps, 18 goals.

Please forgive me for starting this Everton preview with some breaking news concerning Tottenham who, in addition to their new paint sponsor and supplier, have announced a new boot deal which was planned for this year but due to the pandemic, has been carried forward to next season. Apparently a special pair will be presented early to their latest departing manager …..

Just before their pre season friendly against Real Madrid, Ronaldo went into the Madrid changing room to find all his teammates looking a bit glum. “What’s up?” he asked. “Well, we’re having trouble getting motivated for this game. We know it’s important for the fans but it’s only Everton. They’re rubbish and we can’t be bothered.” Ronaldo looked at them and said “Well, I reckon I can beat these by myself, you lads go down the pub.”

So Ronaldo went out to play Everton by himself and the rest of the Madrid team set off for a few jars. After a few pints they wondered how the game was going and asked the landlord to put the teletext on. A big cheer went up as the screen read “Madrid 1 – Everton 0 (Ronaldo 10minutes)”. He was beating Everton all by himself! A few more pints later the game was almost forgotten until someone said “It must be full time now, let’s see how he got on”. They put the teletext back on.


“FT: R Madrid 1 (Ronaldo 10) – Everton 1 (Cahill 89)”


They couldn’t believe it – he had single handedly got a draw against Everton !! They rushed back to the Stadium to congratulate him, but found him in the dressing room, still in his kit, with his head in his hands. He refused to look at them. “I’ve let you down! I’ve let you down!” “Don’t be daft, you got a draw against Everton all by yourself – and they only scored at the very, very end!” “No, no, I have! I’ve let you down… I got sent off after 12 minutes!”

The History Bit

I do actually sense something of an affinity with Everton, which is really borne of the fact that they shared with us the architect of their main stand, Archibald Leitch. As a very young Arsenal fan it sometimes took a second glance just to check I was looking at a picture taken at Highbury and not Goodson Park. At that age they seemed a bit like us, and in some values I think they have remained so. Many other clubs’ stands were also the work of the Glaswegian architect, including Glasgow Rangers, Liverpool, Chelsea, Sunderland, Sheffield United, Aston Villa and, ahem, Tottenham. There were many others besides but, for some strange reason, Everton was always the one that registered with me.

We’ve also shared a few players with Everton over the years. Your memory may be better than mine, but I had forgotten one or two of these – Alan Ball, Francis Jeffers, Theo Walcott, Alex Iwobi, Kevin Campbell, Shkodran Mustafi, Martin Keown, Phillipe Senderos, Richard Wright, Anders Limpar and, of course, Mikel Arteta.


Farhad Moshiri, the ex Red and White Holdings partner of Alisher Usmanov, is now the majority owner of Everton FC, but Red and White Holdings were, of course, the almost 30% shareholders of Arsenal FC, but were denied a seat, and consequently any say, on the board by majority shareholder Stan Kroenke, until they turned their attentions towards the north west around three years ago. A lot of criticism was directed at Usmanov as he vied to gain control of Arsenal, with Kroenke seen by most as the more desirable owner. After the events of this week, it’s hard to imagine how the former of the two could possibly have proven worse.
Since 2017, Usmanov’s USM Holdings have sponsored the Toffees’ training ground and an extension to the deal in the summer of 2019 saw them become Everton’s Official Matchday Presenting Partner, with the MegaFon logo appearing around Goodison Park and on the sleeve of the players’ training kits. What? You’ve never seen an Everton training kit sleeve? Oh well!

The club’s roots loosely lie with a Methodist New Connexion congregation who had a chapel on the corner of Breckfield Road North and St. Domingo Vale in Everton, Liverpool. Initially formed as St. Domingo FC, named after the chapel, the football team was renamed Everton in 1879 after the district of Everton.The club’s nickname, the Toffees, or sometimes the Toffeemen, comes from one of two toffee shops that were located in Everton village at the time the club was founded. Rather than the present day blue and white, the club’s original strip was black and white, a reflection of the locally produced Everton mints.

Everton now follow Arsenal with the second longest pedigree in the top flight, having last been relegated in the 1950-51 season . They were promoted back in 1954, and have remained in the top flight ever since.


The Teams

Arsenal’s current injury list includes Aubameyang, continuing to recover from malaria; Lacazette, left hamstring strain; Luiz, right knee; Tierney, left knee, and Odegaard, right ankle. Of those, only Odegaard will even be assessed ahead of the game, but he is currently only in light training. It seems unlikely he would be risked ahead of the Europa League semi-final – assuming we have not been booted out of the competition by UEFA, following our owner’s regrettable involvement with the proposed and swiftly disintegrated European Super League.

I thought Matt Ryan looked assured in goal last time out but would assume Bernd Leno will return in goal. I will take a stab at the rest of the team but with rotation the name of the current game, it’s anyone’s guess.

Leno

Chambers, Holding, Marí, Xhaka

Partey, Ceballos

Smith-Rowe

Saka, Martinelli, Pépé


Everton currently have injuries to Bernard, Gomes, Calvert -Lewin, Yerri Mina, Delph, Gbamin and Doucoure, although all but the last two could potentially return for this game.

Whatever the teams, Everton’s chances of winning this one were coincidentally summed up by a court case that apparently happened in Liverpool just this week, where a seven-year-old boy was at the centre of a court ruling over who should have custody of him. 

The boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge initially awarded custody to his aunt, in keeping with the law which requires that family unity be maintained to the greatest degree possible. The boy surprised the court when he claimed that his aunt beat him more than his parents, and he flatly refused to live with her. When the judge then suggested that he live with his grandparents, the boy cried out that they also beat him.

After considering the remainder of the immediate family and learning that domestic violence was apparently a way of life among them, the judge took the unprecedented step of allowing the boy to propose who should have custody of him. After two recesses to check legal references and confer with child welfare officials, the judge granted temporary custody to Everton Football Club, whom the boy firmly believes are incapable of beating anyone.

The Holic Pound

Despite the above there are still odds available for this one. Paddy Power are offering a miserly 19/20 on a home win, and what seems a fairly standard 12/5 on the draw, and 14/5 on an away win.If you prefer something a bit more enticing on an Arsenal victory, betfair have 6/1, 8/1 and 15/2 respectively on wins of 1-0, 2-0 and 2-1.

The Referee doing his best to keep up with proceedings will be cuddly Jonathan Moss, and the man drawing the lines on the VAR machine will be David Coote. TV coverage is on Sky Sports. Kick off is on Friday 23rd April at 20.00, UK time.

Enjoy the game, Holics.

Surely it’s in your diary by now?

Celebrate the 50th anniversary of the 1970-71 Double with Goonerholics Forever from 3 May.

Charlie, the King of Highbury with that iconic celebration. 24+1 appearances, 10 goals in 1970-71.

So, this morning we wake up to the potential a brave new world in which the 6 largest clubs by revenue in England join six of their equivalents in Spain and Italy in the potential formation of the European Super League – a rival format to the Champions League.  Most of the reactions have been predictably ire-filled. It does look very much as if the aforementioned clubs are attempting to engage in a game of “Pull-the-ladder-up, Jack”.  And as a result, it would be very easy for me to join in with the cacophony of angry reactions:  no relegation, at least for the founders; contempt or at least lack of sympathy for those left behind; potentially massive disruption to the status quo in European football.  I get it.  But I just want to consider the changes in the light of what I would hold to be the bigger picture. 

Let’s start with a little analysis of that current state, starting from the 1992/93 season when, as we know, Sky invented football.

In the 28 seasons since then, the Premier League has been won by 7 clubs.  However, within this, on 25 occasions it has been won by just 4 clubs.  Each of those is in the ESP group. The Spanish league has been won by 5 clubs, with 25 of those being split between the clubs in the ESL group.  Serie A has been won by 5 clubs, with 25 of those being won by the 3 Italian clubs included in the ESL.  Hmm.  I’m on the point of spotting a pattern….

Of the other European leagues which might be expected to provide entrants, 3 more have histories of 3 clubs winning, you’ve guessed it 25 titles – Germany Portugal and Holland. Only a single major European league has had more than 6 winners in that time – France.   It could easily be argued that this kind of relative stasis is already hard coded into league football across Europe.  

And what of the Champions League itself, for which the proposed competition is the rival? Well, in the same 28 seasons, 25 titles (I’m not making this up) have been won by representatives of 4 leagues. Only the Germans have, as yet, chosen to stay out of the ESL fray.   Of the remaining 21 winners, all of them come from the clubs included in the ESL.  So essentially, we have the same clubs qualifying and winning.  For the rest, and that is all competitors, it is largely an exercise in revenue optimization with little or no chance of success.  The last club out of this group (or Bayern) was Porto and that was nearly 20 years ago.

It is clear that there is no level playing field as things stand.  Rather there is a heavily tilted one. UEFA themselves have done nothing to prevent this situation. FFP was implemented, and perhaps even conceived, so shoddily as to enable any vaguely savvy CFO to drive a coach and horses through it.  Hardly the action of a governing body with its prime or indeed any concern about fairness, I would posit.

And what of the regulators of football?  The Premier League showed no compunction in casting adrift the clubs not included in the new tournament at the inception of Sky’s invention of football, although ultimately it was forced to offer parachute payments and a certain amount of trickledown to lower clubs and the football pyramid.  Of course, we haven’t seen any substantive details on the new offering, but it would only be good politics for the constituents to agree to this once the initial fire has been drawn.  And they have had no qualms about timing games so that away fans either can’t get there or can’t get home by reasonable means of public transport. So, all in all, not perhaps the altruistic benign governors they would like to present themselves as.

UEFA we have already touched on. Although I would like to ask how much concern for fans a governing body arranging for a European final to be played in a city which is as much a part of Europe as a fish is a vegetable and which has no serviceable land or air connectivity to enable fans to attend really has?

For FIFA to opine is for me, the icing on the cake.  An organisation which conspires to arrange for a World Cup to be played in winter, in a desert, in a state with as much care for human rights as your average dictatorship.  Not so much the view from the moral high ground as from the primordial swamp.

These organisations can restrict players and clubs from playing in their sanctioned competitions.  Though I would doubt that legally this would hold water during the lifetime of existing domestic tournaments as the new competition doesn’t impact them, from the little we can currently see.   It remains to be seen how their none-too opaque threats over UEFA and FIFA tournaments play out.

And then we have the bleatings from Sky, obviously concealed behind the public face of its de facto brand ambassadors such as Roy Keane and Gary Neville. For these gentlemen to try to present themselves as somehow the guardians of the way football was, is and always should be run is pushing it somewhat for me.  Where was their concern at the ever-rising cost of entry to the ground, or of a shirt, or of the Sky subscription with the concomitant impact on the real fans, those whose families have been steeped in the game and the local club for years?  They were happy to take the personal benefits presented by the Sky money and its assault on the hugely imperfect status quo, but somehow this must now be fixed in aspic for eternity.  As the great Pete Townshend wrote and the inimitable Daltrey sang – Meet the new boss; same as the old boss.  I can’t help thinking that Sky’s primary concern is defending its own platform’s market share.  It has essentially been created off the back of football and although it has clearly been moving away from relying on football and indeed sport towards a strategy of direct competition with mainstream terrestrial broadcasters across the range of output, that transition is far from complete. 

Lastly, and most definitely least, we have the half-arsed interventions from politicians.   PM Johnson has uttered some fairly mealy-mouthed condemnation about the potential changes.  I honestly cannot imagine this man has ever been to a football match outside of in a political capacity nor that he has any genuine interest either way.  The PM has to say what is expected, especially ahead of elections.

The Leader of the Opposition, apparently an Arsenal fan although as per the PM above, this might well just be a convenient way of hanging his cashmere donkey jacket in a suitably visible place for the proles to see, said this: “This proposal risks shutting the door on fans for good, reducing them to mere spectators and consumers”.  Sorry, what else have we been for the last 30 years and arguably ever?   This is surely the apogee of the politician’s vacuous comment.

Much of the output from the commentariat has really been playing to their own vested interests. The public wave of anger, amid the current trend for encouraging the childlike belief that nuance doesn’t exist and therefore almost any discussion should be framed within an entirely binary horizon, is thus conditioned to react accordingly.  Light blue touchpaper and retire.  

I’m happy to give things a little time to play out, understand what is genuinely being sought and see the degree to which compromises develop, as they most likely will.

Notwithstanding the owner’s craven plans, celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the 1970-71 Double when football was a spectator sport rather than a billionaire’s plaything.

Bertie & Don were the brains behind the 1970-71 Double

“The difference is in the thickness?”

A very late goal by Eddie Nketiah saw Arsenal salvage a point in a game in which almost every aspect of the game gravitated against them. Even then there was an agonising wait as Craig Pawson and his VAR henchmen sought ways to disallow Nketiah’s close range effort. It followed a corner at which Mat Ryan appeared in the box to significant effect. 

While a number of us on this blog have a very soft spot for Fulham they would have been extremely fortuitous winners. Fulham played virtually no football, saw Arsenal have a marginal goal disallowed, profited from a penalty where Lemina jumped like an Olympic high-jumper to con the officials and though they defended bravely with a standout performance by the keeper, Areola, they were very much second-best even to an Arsenal side that increasingly showed the effects of Thursday’s exertions in Prague. Perhaps the worst news for Arsenal was what looked like a nasty hamstring injury suffered by Alexandre Lacazette in the second half. 

Pre- match, my main concern was if you could play in the Fulham defence if your name didn’t begin with A? The game was distinguished by the first mention in the official programme of Goonerholics Forever in respect of our Double celebration and Willow appeal. A lovely gesture by the club.

Mikel Arteta’s team selection was almost certain to be a surprise given the impact of Thursday’s match. The inclusion of Mat Ryan in place of Leno was not expected but not in this correspondent’s view significant. The defence was rotated, as was the midfield, but Xhaka remained in the team at left-back and Ceballos continued. Our recent front three was slightly tweaked with Martinelli starting but Saka, ESR and Lacazette continued from Thursday. 

Taking a knee appeared to be a very significant gesture last Thursday and Laca led us before the match in another pointed protest against racism. 

When the game began it looked briefly like crisp, sharp Arsenal had turned up. Lacazette set up Martinelli in the first minute and his lifted effort over the jumping keeper was just wide. In the sixth minute, Areola then made a good block from Martinelli after fine work by ESR. However, our early flurry didn’t yield a goal despite the brightness of some of our football with ESR, Ceballos and Martinelli prominent and Saka and Martinelli double marked every time they got the ball. Lacazette coming deep was carrying on his excellent link play but Fulham created the next major opportunity when Maja had a shot deflected just wide of the left-hand post with Ryan off-balance. It was to be their only goal attempt, the spot-kick aside.

On 21 minutes, Smith Rowe drove just over and Elneny started to become more visible but not for the right reasons, driving a pass ridiculously firmly at Saka, wrestling Lookman to the ground and then when we moved forward with Fulham under pressure he played the ball back to Holding! 

Then a ‘goal’.  On forty-one minutes, we built pressure from both wings and a teasing chip from Bellerin was subtly headed in by Ceballos. Saka’s toe was clearly offside (!) and the goal disallowed. Another ‘goal’, this time a potential own goal by Andersen was ruled out for a clearer offside by ESR. I wasn’t fully in sync with Roy Keane at half-time, not for the first time it must be said, as he described the game as ‘shocking.’ But it was very much a case of an anti-climax after Thursday. Fulham’s defensive mindset and our increasing fatigue made for a flat spectacle. We had played all the football and had returned from Prague after a big match on Friday morning. Facing a massed defence against a desperate side it was not a straightforward task although the game did have a slightly end of season feel.

Half-time – Arsenal 0 Fulham 0 

We hoped for a sparkier Arsenal performance in the second half. Laca immediately drove wide when decently placed and Bukayo Saka strangely hit the post from an acute angle with his right foot. But then the balance of the game shifted.

In the fifty-fourth minute Fulham shifted forwards and Gabriel blocked Lemina whose leap into the air would have done Dick Fosbury proud. Arsenal fans are used to interminable waits that end badly and this was no exception. Was a Fulham man marginally offside? No! Was it a clear and obvious error? I thought so but I usually do when Craig Pawson is involved. Penalty given. 

Maja hit a very firm penalty high and down the middle giving Ryan no chance. 

Arsenal 0 Fulham 1 – (Maja pen 58) 

Arsenal’s response saw a Bellerin header go just wide before he was hooked along with Elneny for Partey and Pépé. Saka was moved to right-back – yet another position for him to fill. 

The rest of the game was attack v defence even after Lacazette collapsed to the ground clutching his hamstring. Nketiah came on for some rare minutes and understandably found it difficult to adjust to first-team football after so long on the sidelines. 

Without showing any great incisiveness or quality Arsenal furnished many chances. Pépé had a point-blank header saved from a Martinelli cross. Nketiah lofted over and then mis-controlled a beautiful Saka pass. Saka was just wide with a curving shot with two minutes of normal time left. Martinelli had a shot blocked by Areola and then Reid made a great block to deny Martinelli at the death. A flurry of corners seemed certain to come to naught but after Fulham blocked a Ceballos shot, the ball was deflected across to Nketiah and he ran it home at the far post. Scott Parker was apoplectic that Holding was offside but he wasn’t interfering with play and not in Areola’s eyeline. 

Arsenal 1 (Nketiah) Fulham 1 (90 +7 minutes) 

Final Score Arsenal 1 Fulham 1 

So, if Fulham’s first victory at Arsenal eluded them at the death, it was another very disappointing home result. Europe via the League looks a long way away now especially given the injury blow to Laca. We await the visit of Everton on Friday hoping we can produce a fresher performance and one in which VAR is much less intrusive.

It’s coming …. 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »